Document
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
__________________________________________
FORM 10-Q
__________________________________________
[Mark One]
|
| |
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended July 1, 2017
OR
|
| |
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 01-13697
__________________________________________
MOHAWK INDUSTRIES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
__________________________________________
|
| | |
Delaware | | 52-1604305 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
| | |
160 S. Industrial Blvd., Calhoun, Georgia | | 30701 |
(Address of principal executive offices) | | (Zip Code) |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (706) 629-7721
__________________________________________
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer”, “smaller reporting company” and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
| | | | |
Large accelerated filer | x | | Accelerated filer | ¨ |
| | | | |
Non-accelerated filer | ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | | Smaller reporting company | ¨ |
| | | | |
| | | Emerging growth company | ¨ |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
The number of shares outstanding of the issuer’s common stock as of August 1, 2017, the latest practicable date, is as follows: 74,338,177 shares of common stock, $.01 par value.
MOHAWK INDUSTRIES, INC.
INDEX
|
| | |
| | Page No |
Part I. | | |
| | |
Item 1. | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
Item 2. | | |
| | |
Item 3. | | |
| | |
Item 4. | | |
| | |
Part II. | | |
| | |
Item 1. | | |
| | |
Item 1A. | | |
| | |
Item 2. | | |
| | |
Item 3. | | |
| | |
Item 4. | | |
| | |
Item 5. | | |
| | |
Item 6. | | |
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM I. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MOHAWK INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
|
| | | | | | |
| July 1, 2017 | | December 31, 2016 |
ASSETS | | | |
Current assets: | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 130,238 |
| | 121,665 |
|
Receivables, net | 1,639,614 |
| | 1,376,151 |
|
Inventories | 1,865,941 |
| | 1,675,751 |
|
Prepaid expenses | 345,294 |
| | 267,724 |
|
Other current assets | 29,636 |
| | 30,221 |
|
Total current assets | 4,010,723 |
| | 3,471,512 |
|
Property, plant and equipment | 6,958,650 |
| | 6,243,775 |
|
Less: accumulated depreciation | 3,066,399 |
| | 2,873,427 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net | 3,892,251 |
| | 3,370,348 |
|
Goodwill | 2,417,058 |
| | 2,274,426 |
|
Tradenames | 624,999 |
| | 580,147 |
|
Other intangible assets subject to amortization, net | 253,302 |
| | 254,459 |
|
Deferred income taxes and other non-current assets | 391,158 |
| | 279,704 |
|
| $ | 11,589,491 |
| | 10,230,596 |
|
|
| | | | | | |
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | | |
Current liabilities: | | | |
Short-term debt and current portion of long-term debt | $ | 1,754,077 |
| | 1,382,738 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | 1,466,658 |
| | 1,335,582 |
|
Total current liabilities | 3,220,735 |
| | 2,718,320 |
|
Deferred income taxes | 389,259 |
| | 361,416 |
|
Long-term debt, less current portion | 1,174,440 |
| | 1,128,747 |
|
Other long-term liabilities | 323,851 |
| | 214,930 |
|
Total liabilities | 5,108,285 |
| | 4,423,413 |
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 13) |
| |
|
Redeemable noncontrolling interest | 26,713 |
| | 23,696 |
|
Stockholders’ equity: | | | |
Preferred stock, $.01 par value; 60 shares authorized; no shares issued | — |
| | — |
|
Common stock, $.01 par value; 150,000 shares authorized; 81,688 and 81,519 shares issued in 2017 and 2016, respectively | 817 |
| | 815 |
|
Additional paid-in capital | 1,804,065 |
| | 1,791,540 |
|
Retained earnings | 5,494,149 |
| | 5,032,914 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (636,787 | ) | | (833,027 | ) |
| 6,662,244 |
| | 5,992,242 |
|
Less treasury stock at cost; 7,350 and 7,351 shares in 2017 and 2016, respectively | 215,766 |
| | 215,791 |
|
Total Mohawk Industries, Inc. stockholders' equity | 6,446,478 |
| | 5,776,451 |
|
Nonredeemable noncontrolling interest | 8,015 |
| | 7,036 |
|
Total stockholders' equity | 6,454,493 |
| | 5,783,487 |
|
| $ | 11,589,491 |
| | 10,230,596 |
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
MOHAWK INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended | | Six Months Ended |
| July 1, 2017 | | July 2, 2016 | | July 1, 2017 | | July 2, 2016 |
Net sales | $ | 2,453,038 |
| | 2,310,336 |
| | 4,673,683 |
| | 4,482,382 |
|
Cost of sales | 1,673,902 |
| | 1,554,748 |
| | 3,214,194 |
| | 3,087,115 |
|
Gross profit | 779,136 |
| | 755,588 |
| | 1,459,489 |
| | 1,395,267 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses | 423,311 |
| | 404,896 |
| | 828,880 |
| | 798,903 |
|
Operating income | 355,825 |
| | 350,692 |
| | 630,609 |
| | 596,364 |
|
Interest expense | 8,393 |
| | 10,351 |
| | 16,595 |
| | 22,652 |
|
Other expense (income), net | 3,002 |
| | (5,807 | ) | | 170 |
| | (2,378 | ) |
Earnings before income taxes | 344,430 |
| | 346,148 |
| | 613,844 |
| | 576,090 |
|
Income tax expense | 82,682 |
| | 90,034 |
| | 151,040 |
| | 147,859 |
|
Net earnings including noncontrolling interests | 261,748 |
| | 256,114 |
| | 462,804 |
| | 428,231 |
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | 1,067 |
| | 926 |
| | 1,569 |
| | 1,495 |
|
Net earnings attributable to Mohawk Industries, Inc. | $ | 260,681 |
| | 255,188 |
| | 461,235 |
| | 426,736 |
|
| | | | | | | |
Basic earnings per share attributable to Mohawk Industries, Inc. | | | | | | | |
Basic earnings per share attributable to Mohawk Industries, Inc. | $ | 3.51 |
| | 3.44 |
| | 6.21 |
| | 5.76 |
|
Weighted-average common shares outstanding—basic | 74,327 |
| | 74,123 |
| | 74,269 |
| | 74,049 |
|
| | | | | | | |
Diluted earnings per share attributable to Mohawk Industries, Inc. | | | | | | | |
Diluted earnings per share attributable to Mohawk Industries, Inc. | $ | 3.48 |
| | 3.42 |
| | 6.17 |
| | 5.73 |
|
Weighted-average common shares outstanding—diluted | 74,801 |
| | 74,574 |
| | 74,773 |
| | 74,526 |
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
MOHAWK INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended | | Six Months Ended |
| July 1, 2017 | | July 2, 2016 | | July 1, 2017 | | July 2, 2016 |
Net earnings including noncontrolling interests | $ | 261,748 |
| | 256,114 |
| | 462,804 |
| | 428,231 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss): | | | | | | | |
Foreign currency translation adjustments | 113,465 |
| | (43,054 | ) | | 197,088 |
| | 77,714 |
|
Pension prior service cost and actuarial (loss) gain | (266 | ) | | 13 |
| | (848 | ) | | (7 | ) |
Other comprehensive income (loss) | 113,199 |
| | (43,041 | ) | | 196,240 |
| | 77,707 |
|
Comprehensive income | 374,947 |
| | 213,073 |
| | 659,044 |
| | 505,938 |
|
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests | 1,067 |
| | 926 |
| | 1,569 |
| | 1,495 |
|
Comprehensive income attributable to Mohawk Industries, Inc. | $ | 373,880 |
| | 212,147 |
| | 657,475 |
| | 504,443 |
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
MOHAWK INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(Unaudited) |
| | | | | | |
| Six Months Ended |
| July 1, 2017 | | July 2, 2016 |
Cash flows from operating activities: | | | |
Net earnings | $ | 462,804 |
| | 428,231 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities: | | | |
Restructuring | 16,353 |
| | 9,524 |
|
Depreciation and amortization | 214,785 |
| | 201,408 |
|
Deferred income taxes | 4,679 |
| | 17,375 |
|
Loss (gain) on disposal of property, plant and equipment | 915 |
| | (2,421 | ) |
Stock-based compensation expense | 23,430 |
| | 23,547 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisitions: | | | |
Receivables, net | (166,643 | ) | | (201,249 | ) |
Inventories | (93,248 | ) | | (41,305 | ) |
Other assets and prepaid expenses | (64,447 | ) | | 53,101 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | 17,598 |
| | 79,876 |
|
Other liabilities | (2,348 | ) | | (3,348 | ) |
Net cash provided by operating activities | 413,878 |
| | 564,739 |
|
Cash flows from investing activities: | | | |
Additions to property, plant and equipment | (425,423 | ) | | (276,914 | ) |
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired | (250,468 | ) | | — |
|
Net cash used in investing activities | (675,891 | ) | | (276,914 | ) |
Cash flows from financing activities: | | | |
Payments on Senior Credit Facilities | (259,086 | ) | | (278,879 | ) |
Proceeds from Senior Credit Facilities | 240,674 |
| | 266,534 |
|
Payments on Commercial Paper | (7,155,819 | ) | | (13,888,260 | ) |
Proceeds from Commercial Paper | 7,799,905 |
| | 14,294,098 |
|
Repayment of senior notes | — |
| | (645,555 | ) |
Payments of other debt and financing costs | (6,208 | ) | | — |
|
Payments on asset securitization borrowings | (500,000 | ) | | — |
|
Proceeds from asset securitization borrowings | 150,000 |
| | — |
|
Debt issuance costs | (567 | ) | | (1,086 | ) |
Change in outstanding checks in excess of cash | (538 | ) | | (3,981 | ) |
Shares redeemed for taxes | (12,255 | ) | | (11,671 | ) |
Proceeds and net tax benefit from stock transactions | 1,202 |
| | 4,133 |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | 257,308 |
| | (264,667 | ) |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents | 13,278 |
| | 7,199 |
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents | 8,573 |
| | 30,357 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period | 121,665 |
| | 81,692 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period | $ | 130,238 |
| | 112,049 |
|
| | | |
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
MOHAWK INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
1. General
Interim Reporting
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with instructions to Form 10-Q and do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("U.S. GAAP") for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. These statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto, and the Company’s description of critical accounting policies, included in the Company’s 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results for the year.
Hedges of Net Investments in Non-U.S. Operations
The Company has numerous investments outside the United States. The net assets of these subsidiaries are exposed to changes and volatility in currency exchange rates. The Company uses foreign currency denominated debt to hedge some of its non-U.S. net investments against adverse movements in exchange rates. The gains and losses on the Company's net investments in its non-U.S. operations are partially economically offset by gains and losses on its foreign currency borrowings. The Company designated its €500,000 2.00% Senior Notes borrowing as a net investment hedge of a portion of its European operations. For the six months ended July 1, 2017, the change in the U.S. dollar value of the Company's euro denominated debt was an increase of $45,314 ($28,321 net of taxes), which is recorded in the foreign currency translation adjustment component of other comprehensive income (loss). The increase in the U.S. dollar value of the Company's debt partially offsets the euro-to-dollar translation of the Company's net investment in its European operations.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements - Effective in Future Years
In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. This topic converges the guidance within U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS") and supersedes ASC 605, Revenue Recognition. The new standard requires companies to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in amounts that reflect the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The new standard will also result in enhanced disclosures about revenue, provide guidance for transactions that were not previously addressed comprehensively, and improve guidance for multiple-element arrangements. The new guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period and early application is not permitted. On July 9, 2015, the FASB decided to defer the effective date of ASC 606 for one year. The deferral results in the new revenue standard being effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company will adopt the provisions of this new accounting standard at the beginning of fiscal year 2018, using the cumulative effect method. The Company continues to analyze the adoption of ASC 606, including certain contracts that could result in a change in the timing of the recognition of revenue, the identification of new controls and processes designed to meet the requirements of the standard, and the required new disclosures upon adoption. At this time ASC 606 is not expected to have a material impact on the amounts reported in the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases. The amendments in this Update create Topic 842, Leases, and supersede the requirements in Topic 840, Leases. Topic 842 specifies the accounting for leases. The objective of Topic 842 is to establish the principles that lessees and lessors shall apply to report useful information to users of financial statements about the amount, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows arising from a lease. The guidance in this update is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018 including interim periods within that reporting period and early adoption is permitted. The Company plans to adopt the provisions of this update at the beginning of fiscal year 2019. Based on a preliminary assessment, the Company expects the adoption of this guidance to have a material impact on its assets and liabilities due to the recognition of right-of-use assets and lease liabilities on its consolidated balance sheets at the beginning of the earliest period presented. The Company is continuing its assessment, which may identify additional impacts this guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements and disclosures.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of credit losses on financial instruments. Topic 326 amends guidance on reporting credit losses by replacing the current incurred loss model with a forward-looking expected loss model. Current accounting delays the recognition of credit losses until it is probable a loss has been incurred. The update will require a financial asset measured at amortized cost to be presented at the net amount expected to be collected by means of an allowance for credit losses that runs through net income. ASU 2016-13 is effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company plans to adopt the provisions of this update at the beginning of fiscal year 2020, and is currently assessing the impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230). This update clarifies how entities should classify certain cash receipts and cash payments on the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-15 also clarifies how the predominance principle should be applied when cash receipts and cash payments have aspects of more than one class of cash flows. Additionally, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18 in November 2016 to address the classification and presentation of changes in restricted cash on the statement of cash flows. The guidance in these updates should be applied retrospectively and are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those years. Early adoption is permitted. The Company plans to adopt the provisions of these updates at the beginning of fiscal year 2018 and is currently assessing the impact on its consolidated statement of cash flows.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the definition of a business. The amendments clarify the definition of a business with the objective of adding guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of businesses. The guidance in this update is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those years.
In January 2017, the FASB also issued ASU 2017-04, Intangibles - Goodwill and other (Topic 350): Simplifying the test for goodwill impairment. The amendments remove the second step of the current goodwill impairment test. An entity will apply a one-step quantitative test and record the amount of goodwill impairment as the excess of a reporting unit's carrying amount over its fair value, not to exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to the reporting unit. The new guidance does not amend the optional qualitative assessment of goodwill impairment. This guidance is effective for impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements - Recently Adopted
In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-11, Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory. This update changes the measurement principle for inventory for entities using FIFO or average cost from the lower of cost or market to lower of cost and net realizable value. Entities that measure inventory using LIFO or the retail inventory method are not affected. This update will more closely align the accounting for inventory under U.S. GAAP with IFRS. The Company currently accounts for inventory using the FIFO method. The Company adopted the provisions of this update at the beginning of fiscal year 2017. This update did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. This update simplifies several aspects of the accounting for employee share-based payment transactions for both public and nonpublic entities, including the accounting for income taxes, forfeitures, and statutory tax withholding requirements, as well as classification in the statement of cash flows. The Company adopted the provisions of this update at the beginning of fiscal year 2017, with the statement of cash flows classifications applied retrospectively. Accordingly, cash paid for shares redeemed for taxes of $11,671 was reclassed to financing activities from operating activities for the six months ended July 2, 2016. Additionally, excess tax benefits are now classified with other tax flows as an operating activity with $3,688 reclassified from financing activities for the six months ended July 2, 2016. The Company has also elected to continue to estimate the number of awards that are expected to vest when accounting for forfeitures.
2. Acquisitions
Emil
On April 4, 2017, the Company completed its purchase of Emilceramica S.r.l (“Emil”), a ceramic company in Italy. The total value of the acquisition was $186,244. The Emil acquisition will enhance the Company's cost position and strengthen its combined brand and distribution in Europe. The acquisition's results and purchase price allocation have been included in the consolidated financial statements since the date of the acquisition. The Company's acquisition of Emil resulted in a preliminary goodwill allocation of $59,303, indefinite-lived tradename intangible asset of $16,196 and an intangible asset subject to amortization of $2,348. The goodwill is not expected to be deductible for tax purposes. The factors contributing to the recognition of the
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
amount of goodwill include product, sales and manufacturing synergies. The Emil results are reflected in the Global Ceramic segment and the results of Emil's operations were not material to the Company's consolidated results of operations.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Other Acquisitions
During the second quarter of 2017, the Company completed the acquisition of two businesses in the Global Ceramic segment for $36,774, resulting in a preliminary goodwill allocation of $526. The Company also completed the acquisition of a business in the Flooring NA segment for $26,623.
During the first quarter of 2017, the Company acquired certain assets of a distribution business in the Flooring ROW segment for $1,407, resulting in intangible assets subject to amortization of $827.
3. Restructuring, acquisition and integration-related costs
The Company incurs costs in connection with acquiring, integrating and restructuring acquisitions and in connection with its global cost-reduction/productivity initiatives. For example:
| |
• | In connection with acquisition activity, the Company typically incurs costs associated with executing the transactions, integrating the acquired operations (which may include expenditures for consulting and the integration of systems and processes), and restructuring the combined company (which may include charges related to employees, assets and activities that will not continue in the combined company); and |
| |
• | In connection with the Company's cost-reduction/productivity initiatives, it typically incurs costs and charges associated with site closings and other facility rationalization actions and workforce reductions. |
Restructuring, acquisition transaction and integration-related costs consisted of the following during the three and six months ended July 1, 2017 and July 2, 2016:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended | | Six Months Ended |
| July 1, 2017 | | | July 2, 2016 | | July 1, 2017 | | | July 2, 2016 |
Cost of sales | | | | | | | | | |
Restructuring costs (a) | $ | 12,165 |
| | | 2,798 |
| | 15,063 |
| | | 7,824 |
|
Acquisition integration-related costs | 863 |
| | | (20 | ) | | 777 |
| | | 802 |
|
Restructuring and integration-related costs | $ | 13,028 |
| | | 2,778 |
| | 15,840 |
| | | 8,626 |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
Selling, general and administrative expenses | | | | | | | | | |
Restructuring costs (a) | $ | 1,163 |
| | | 1,473 |
| | 1,290 |
| | | 1,700 |
|
Acquisition transaction-related costs | 212 |
| | | — |
| | 212 |
| | | — |
|
Acquisition integration-related costs | 1,475 |
| | | 1,769 |
| | 2,514 |
| | | 2,736 |
|
Restructuring, acquisition and integration-related costs | $ | 2,850 |
| | | 3,242 |
| | 4,016 |
| | | 4,436 |
|
(a) The restructuring costs for 2017 and 2016 primarily relate to the Company's actions taken to lower its cost structure and improve efficiencies of manufacturing and distribution operations as well as actions related to the Company's recent acquisitions.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
The restructuring activity for the six months ended July 1, 2017 is as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Lease impairments | | Asset write-downs | | Severance | | Other restructuring costs | | Total |
Balance as of December 31, 2016 | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | 5,183 |
| | 6,243 |
| | 11,426 |
|
Provision - Global Ceramic segment | 492 |
| | — |
| | 261 |
| | 11 |
| | 764 |
|
Provision - Flooring NA segment | 316 |
| | 6,849 |
| | — |
| | 6,191 |
| | 13,356 |
|
Provision - Flooring ROW segment | — |
| | 584 |
| | 644 |
| | 1,005 |
| | 2,233 |
|
Cash payments | (213 | ) | | (124 | ) | | (4,873 | ) | | (12,231 | ) | | (17,441 | ) |
Non-cash items | — |
| | (7,309 | ) | | 45 |
| | (88 | ) | | (7,352 | ) |
Balance as of July 1, 2017 | $ | 595 |
| | $ | — |
| | 1,260 |
| | 1,131 |
| | 2,986 |
|
The Company expects the remaining severance and other restructuring costs to be paid over the next year.
4. Receivables, net
Receivables, net are as follows:
|
| | | | | | |
| July 1, 2017 | | December 31, 2016 |
Customers, trade | $ | 1,651,769 |
| | 1,386,306 |
|
Income tax receivable | 10,139 |
| | 8,616 |
|
Other | 69,177 |
| | 59,564 |
|
| 1,731,085 |
| | 1,454,486 |
|
Less: allowance for discounts, returns, claims and doubtful accounts | 91,471 |
| | 78,335 |
|
Receivables, net | $ | 1,639,614 |
| | 1,376,151 |
|
5. Inventories
The components of inventories are as follows:
|
| | | | | | |
| July 1, 2017 | | December 31, 2016 |
Finished goods | $ | 1,300,104 |
| | 1,127,573 |
|
Work in process | 149,229 |
| | 137,310 |
|
Raw materials | 416,608 |
| | 410,868 |
|
Total inventories | $ | 1,865,941 |
| | 1,675,751 |
|
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
6. Goodwill and intangible assets
The components of goodwill and other intangible assets are as follows:
Goodwill:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Global Ceramic segment | | Flooring NA segment | | Flooring ROW segment | | Total |
Balance as of December 31, 2016 | | | | | | | |
Goodwill | $ | 1,482,226 |
| | 869,764 |
| | 1,249,861 |
| | 3,601,851 |
|
Accumulated impairment losses | (531,930 | ) | | (343,054 | ) | | (452,441 | ) | | (1,327,425 | ) |
| $ | 950,296 |
| | 526,710 |
| | 797,420 |
| | 2,274,426 |
|
| | | | | | | |
Goodwill recognized or adjusted during the period | $ | 59,829 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 59,829 |
|
Currency translation during the period | $ | 14,348 |
| | — |
| | 68,455 |
| | 82,803 |
|
| | | | | | | |
Balance as of July 1, 2017 | | | | | | | |
Goodwill | $ | 1,556,403 |
| | 869,764 |
| | 1,318,316 |
| | 3,744,483 |
|
Accumulated impairment losses | (531,930 | ) | | (343,054 | ) | | (452,441 | ) | | (1,327,425 | ) |
| $ | 1,024,473 |
| | 526,710 |
| | 865,875 |
| | 2,417,058 |
|
Intangible assets not subject to amortization:
|
| | | |
| Tradenames |
Balance as of December 31, 2016 | $ | 580,147 |
|
Intangible assets acquired during the period | 16,196 |
|
Currency translation during the period | 28,656 |
|
Balance as of July 1, 2017 | $ | 624,999 |
|
Intangible assets subject to amortization:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Gross carrying amounts: | Customer relationships | | Patents | | Other | | Total |
Balance as of December 31, 2016 | $ | 569,980 |
| | 234,022 |
| | 6,330 |
| | 810,332 |
|
Intangible assets recognized or adjusted during the period | 3,175 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 3,175 |
|
Currency translation during the period | 31,814 |
| | 20,158 |
| | 291 |
| | 52,263 |
|
Balance as of July 1, 2017 | $ | 604,969 |
| | 254,180 |
| | 6,621 |
| | 865,770 |
|
| | | | | | | |
Accumulated amortization: | Customer relationships | | Patents | | Other | | Total |
Balance as of December 31, 2016 | $ | 334,276 |
| | 220,598 |
| | 999 |
| | 555,873 |
|
Amortization during the period | 12,945 |
| | 6,404 |
| | 32 |
| | 19,381 |
|
Currency translation during the period | 17,851 |
| | 19,362 |
| | 1 |
| | 37,214 |
|
Balance as of July 1, 2017 | $ | 365,072 |
| | 246,364 |
| | 1,032 |
| | 612,468 |
|
| | | | | | | |
Intangible assets subject to amortization, net | $ | 239,897 |
| | 7,816 |
| | 5,589 |
| | 253,302 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended | | Six Months Ended |
| July 1, 2017 | | July 2, 2016 | | July 1, 2017 | | July 2, 2016 |
Amortization expense | $ | 9,322 |
| | 9,494 |
| | 19,381 |
| | 19,058 |
|
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
7. Accounts payable and accrued expenses
Accounts payable and accrued expenses are as follows:
|
| | | | | | |
| July 1, 2017 | | December 31, 2016 |
Outstanding checks in excess of cash | $ | 11,737 |
| | 12,269 |
|
Accounts payable, trade | 871,438 |
| | 729,415 |
|
Accrued expenses | 327,595 |
| | 333,942 |
|
Product warranties | 45,080 |
| | 46,347 |
|
Accrued interest | 15,257 |
| | 20,396 |
|
Accrued compensation and benefits | 195,551 |
| | 193,213 |
|
Total accounts payable and accrued expenses | $ | 1,466,658 |
| | 1,335,582 |
|
8. Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
The changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) by component, net of tax, for the six months ended July 1, 2017 are as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| Foreign currency translation adjustments | | Pensions | | Total |
Balance as of December 31, 2016 | $ | (825,354 | ) | | (7,673 | ) | | (833,027 | ) |
Current period other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications | 197,088 |
| | (848 | ) | | 196,240 |
|
Balance as of July 1, 2017 | $ | (628,266 | ) | | (8,521 | ) | | (636,787 | ) |
9. Stock-based compensation
The Company recognizes compensation expense for all share-based payments granted based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of the FASB ASC 718-10. Compensation expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the options’ or other awards’ estimated lives for fixed awards with ratable vesting provisions.
The Company granted 153 restricted stock units ("RSUs") at a weighted average grant-date fair value of $226.85 per unit for the three and six months ended July 1, 2017. The Company granted 182 RSUs at a weighted average grant-date fair value of $184.88 per unit for the three and six months ended July 2, 2016. The Company recognized stock-based compensation costs related to the issuance of RSUs of $13,875 ($8,419 net of taxes) and $14,470 ($8,780 net of taxes) for the three months ended July 1, 2017 and July 2, 2016, respectively, which has been allocated to cost of sales and selling, general and administrative expenses. The Company recognized stock-based compensation costs related to the issuance of RSUs of $23,424 ($14,214 net of taxes) and $23,520 ($14,271 net of taxes) for the six months ended July 1, 2017 and July 2, 2016, respectively, which has been allocated to cost of sales and selling, general and administrative expenses. Pre-tax unrecognized compensation expense for unvested RSUs granted to employees, net of estimated forfeitures, was $37,970 as of July 1, 2017, and will be recognized as expense over a weighted-average period of approximately 1.74 years. The Company also recognized stock-based compensation costs related to stock options of $6 ($4 net of taxes) and $27 ($16 net of taxes) for the six months ended July 1, 2017 and July 2, 2016, respectively, which has been allocated to cost of sales and selling, general and administrative expenses.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
10. Other expense (income) expense, net
Other expense (income), net is as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended | | Six Months Ended |
| July 1, 2017 | | July 2, 2016 | | July 1, 2017 | | July 2, 2016 |
Foreign currency losses (income), net | $ | 5,008 |
| | (1,665 | ) | | 2,685 |
| | 3,377 |
|
All other, net | (2,006 | ) | | (4,142 | ) | | (2,515 | ) | | (5,755 | ) |
Total other expense (income), net | $ | 3,002 |
| | (5,807 | ) | | 170 |
| | (2,378 | ) |
11. Earnings per share
Basic earnings per common share is computed by dividing earnings from continuing operations attributable to Mohawk Industries, Inc. by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each period. Diluted earnings per common share assumes the exercise of outstanding stock options and the vesting of RSUs using the treasury stock method when the effects of such assumptions are dilutive. A reconciliation of earnings attributable to Mohawk Industries, Inc. and weighted average common shares outstanding for purposes of calculating basic and diluted earnings per share is as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended | | Six Months Ended |
| July 1, 2017 | | July 2, 2016 | | July 1, 2017 | | July 2, 2016 |
Net earnings attributable to Mohawk Industries, Inc. | $ | 260,681 |
| | 255,188 |
| | 461,235 |
| | 426,736 |
|
| | | | | | | |
Weighted-average common shares outstanding-basic and diluted: | | | | | | | |
Weighted-average common shares outstanding—basic | 74,327 |
| | 74,123 |
| | 74,269 |
| | 74,049 |
|
Add weighted-average dilutive potential common shares—options to purchase common shares and RSUs, net | 474 |
| | 451 |
| | 504 |
| | 477 |
|
Weighted-average common shares outstanding-diluted | 74,801 |
| | 74,574 |
| | 74,773 |
| | 74,526 |
|
| | | | | | | |
Earnings per share attributable to Mohawk Industries, Inc. | | | | | | | |
Basic | $ | 3.51 |
| | 3.44 |
| | 6.21 |
| | 5.76 |
|
Diluted | $ | 3.48 |
| | 3.42 |
| | 6.17 |
| | 5.73 |
|
12. Segment reporting
The Company has three reporting segments: the Global Ceramic segment, the Flooring NA segment and the Flooring ROW segment. The Global Ceramic segment designs, manufactures, sources and markets a broad line of ceramic tile, porcelain tile, natural stone and other products, which it distributes primarily in North America, Europe and Russia through its network of regional distribution centers and Company-operated service centers. The segment’s product lines are sold through Company-operated service centers, independent distributors, home center retailers, tile and flooring retailers and contractors. The Flooring NA segment designs, manufactures, sources and markets its floor covering product lines, including carpets, rugs, carpet pad, hardwood, laminate and vinyl products, including LVT, which it distributes through its network of regional distribution centers and satellite warehouses using company-operated trucks, common carrier or rail transportation. The segment’s product lines are sold through various selling channels, including independent floor covering retailers, home centers, mass merchandisers, department stores, shop at home, buying groups, commercial dealers and commercial end users. The Flooring ROW segment designs, manufactures, sources, licenses and markets laminate, hardwood flooring, roofing elements, insulation boards, medium-density fiberboard, chipboards, sheet vinyl and LVT, which it distributes primarily in Europe and Russia through various selling channels, which include retailers, independent distributors and home centers.
The accounting policies for each operating segment are consistent with the Company’s policies for the consolidated financial statements. Amounts disclosed for each segment are prior to any elimination or consolidation entries. Corporate general
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
and administrative expenses attributable to each segment are estimated and allocated accordingly. Segment performance is evaluated based on operating income.
Segment information is as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended | | Six Months Ended |
| July 1, 2017 | | July 2, 2016 | | July 1, 2017 | | July 2, 2016 |
Net sales: | | | | | | | |
Global Ceramic segment | $ | 902,670 |
| | 829,794 |
| | 1,687,639 |
| | 1,603,520 |
|
Flooring NA segment | 1,040,299 |
| | 980,693 |
| | 1,979,795 |
| | 1,887,057 |
|
Flooring ROW segment | 510,069 |
| | 499,849 |
| | 1,006,249 |
| | 991,805 |
|
Intersegment sales | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| $ | 2,453,038 |
| | 2,310,336 |
| | 4,673,683 |
| | 4,482,382 |
|
Operating income (loss): | | | | | | | |
Global Ceramic segment | $ | 152,557 |
| | 140,606 |
| | 268,593 |
| | 240,383 |
|
Flooring NA segment | 127,482 |
| | 118,946 |
| | 219,624 |
| | 194,297 |
|
Flooring ROW segment | 86,052 |
| | 101,062 |
| | 162,147 |
| | 180,599 |
|
Corporate and intersegment eliminations | (10,266 | ) | | (9,922 | ) | | (19,755 | ) | | (18,915 | ) |
| $ | 355,825 |
| | 350,692 |
| | 630,609 |
| | 596,364 |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| July 1, 2017 | | December 31, 2016 |
Assets: | | | |
Global Ceramic segment | $ | 4,736,068 |
| | 4,024,859 |
|
Flooring NA segment | 3,625,350 |
| | 3,410,856 |
|
Flooring ROW segment | 2,984,716 |
| | 2,689,592 |
|
Corporate and intersegment eliminations | 243,357 |
| | 105,289 |
|
| $ | 11,589,491 |
| | 10,230,596 |
|
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
13. Commitments and contingencies
The Company is involved in litigation from time to time in the regular course of its business. Except as noted below, there are no material legal proceedings pending or known by the Company to be contemplated to which the Company is a party or to which any of its property is subject.
Alabama Municipal Litigation
In September 2016, the Water Works and Sewer Board of the City of Gadsden, Alabama (the “Gadsden Water Board”) filed an individual complaint in the Circuit Court of Etowah County, Alabama against certain manufacturers, suppliers and users of chemicals containing perfluorinated compounds, including the Company. On October 26, 2016, the defendants removed the case to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama, Middle Division, alleging diversity of citizenship and fraudulent joinder. The Gadsden Water Board filed a motion to remand the case back to the state court and the defendants have opposed the Gadsden Water Board’s motion. The parties await a ruling from the federal court on the motion to remand.
In May, 2017, the Water Works and Sewer Board of the Town of Centre, Alabama (the “Centre Water Board”) filed a very similar complaint to the Gadsden Water Board complaint in the Circuit Court of Cherokee County. On June 19, 2017, the defendants removed this case to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama, Middle Division, again alleging diversity of citizenship and fraudulent joinder. The Centre Water Board filed a motion to remand the case back to state court. The defendants will oppose the Centre Water Board’s motion.
The Company has never manufactured perfluorinated compounds, but purchased them for use in the manufacture of its carpets prior to 2007. The Gadsden and Centre Water Boards are not alleging that chemical levels in the Company’s wastewater discharge exceeded legal limits. Instead, the Gadsden and Centre Water Boards are seeking lost profits based on allegations that their customers decreased water purchases, as well as reimbursement for the cost of a filter and punitive damages.
The Company intends to pursue all available defenses related to these matters. The Company does not believe that the ultimate outcome of this case will have a material adverse effect on its financial condition, but there can be no assurances at this stage that the outcome will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations, liquidity or cash flows in a given period. Furthermore, the Company cannot predict whether any additional civil or regulatory actions against it may arise from the allegations in this matter.
Belgian Tax Matter
In January 2012, the Company received a €23,789 assessment from the Belgian tax authority related to its year ended December 31, 2008, asserting that the Company had understated its Belgian taxable income for that year. The Company filed a formal protest in the first quarter of 2012 refuting the Belgian tax authority's position. The Belgian tax authority set aside the assessment in the third quarter of 2012 and refunded all related deposits, including interest income of €1,583 earned on such deposits. However, on October 23, 2012, the Belgian tax authority notified the Company of its intent to increase the Company's taxable income for the year ended December 31, 2008 under a revised theory. On December 28, 2012, the Belgian tax authority issued assessments for the years ended December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2009, in the amounts of €46,135 and €35,567, respectively, including penalties, but excluding interest. The Company filed a formal protest during the first quarter of 2013 relating to the new assessments. In September 2013, the Belgian tax authority denied the Company's protests, and the Company has brought these two years before the Court of First Appeal in Bruges. In December 2013, the Belgian tax authority issued additional assessments related to the years ended December 31, 2006, 2007, and 2010, in the amounts of €38,817, €39,635, and €43,117, respectively, including penalties, but excluding interest. The Company filed formal protests during the first quarter of 2014, refuting the Belgian tax authority's position for each of the years assessed. In the quarter ended June 28, 2014, the Company received a formal assessment for the year ended December 31, 2008, totaling €30,131, against which the Company also submitted its formal protest. All 4 additional years were brought before the Court of First Appeal in November 2014. In January of 2015, the Company met with the Court of First Appeal in Bruges and agreed with the Belgian tax authorities to consolidate and argue the issues regarding the years 2005 and 2009, and apply the ruling to all of the open years (to the extent there are no additional facts/procedural arguments in the other years). In May 2017, the statute of limitation was extended to include the calendar year 2011.
On January 27, 2016, the Court of First Appeal in Bruges, Belgium ruled in favor of the Company with respect to the calendar years ending December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2009. On March 9, 2016, the Belgian tax authority lodged its Notification of Appeal with the Ghent Court of Appeal.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
The Company disagrees with the views of the Belgian tax authority on this matter and will persist in its vigorous defense. Nevertheless, on May 24, 2016, the tax collector representing the Belgian tax authorities imposed a lien on the Company's properties in Wielsbeke (Ooigemstraat and Breestraat), Oostrozebeke (Ingelmunstersteenweg) and Desselgem (Waregemstraat) included in the Flooring ROW segment. The purpose of the lien is to provide security for payment should the Belgian tax authority prevail on its appeal. The lien does not interfere with the Company's operations at these properties.
The Company believes that adequate provisions for resolution of all contingencies, claims and pending litigation have been made for probable losses that are reasonably estimable. These contingencies are subject to significant uncertainties and we are unable to estimate the amount or range of loss, if any, in excess of amounts accrued. Although there can be no assurances, the Company does not believe that the ultimate outcome of these actions will have a material adverse effect on its financial condition but could have a material adverse effect on its results of operations, cash flows or liquidity in a given quarter or year.
14. Debt
Senior Credit Facility
On March 26, 2015, the Company amended and restated its 2013 Senior Credit Facility increasing its size from $1,000,000 to $1,800,000 and extending the maturity from September 25, 2018 to March 26, 2020 (as amended and restated, the "2015 Senior Credit Facility"). The 2015 Senior Credit Facility eliminated certain provisions in the 2013 Senior Credit Facility, including those that: (a) accelerated the maturity date to 90 days prior to the maturity of senior notes due in January 2016 if certain specified liquidity levels were not met; and (b) required that certain subsidiaries guarantee the Company's obligations if the Company’s credit ratings fell below investment grade. The 2015 Senior Credit Facility also modified certain negative covenants to provide the Company with additional flexibility, including flexibility to make acquisitions and incur additional indebtedness. On March 1, 2016, the Company amended the 2015 Senior Credit Facility to, among other things, carve out from the general limitation on subsidiary indebtedness with respect to the issuance of Euro-denominated commercial paper notes by subsidiaries. Additionally, at several points in 2016, the Company extended the maturity date of the 2015 Senior Credit Facility from March 26, 2020 to March 26, 2021. In March 2017, the Company amended the 2015 Senior Credit Facility to extend the maturity date from March 26, 2021 to March 26, 2022 with respect to all but $75,000 of the total amount committed under the 2015 Senior Credit Facility. In April 2017 and June 2017, the Company extended the maturity for the remaining $75,000 to March 26, 2022.
At the Company's election, revolving loans under the 2015 Senior Credit Facility bear interest at annual rates equal to either (a) LIBOR for 1, 2, 3 or 6 month periods, as selected by the Company, plus an applicable margin ranging between 1.00% and 1.75% (1.125% as of July 1, 2017), or (b) the higher of the Wells Fargo Bank, National Association prime rate, the Federal Funds rate plus 0.5%, or a monthly LIBOR rate plus 1.0%, plus an applicable margin ranging between 0.00% and 0.75% (0.125% as of July 1, 2017). The Company also pays a commitment fee to the lenders under the 2015 Senior Credit Facility on the average amount by which the aggregate commitments of the lenders' exceed utilization of the 2015 Senior Credit Facility ranging from 0.10% to 0.225% per annum (0.125% as of July 1, 2017). The applicable margins and the commitment fee are determined based on whichever of the Company's Consolidated Net Leverage Ratio or its senior unsecured debt rating (or if not available, corporate family rating) results in the lower applicable margins and commitment fee (with applicable margins and the commitment fee increasing as that ratio increases or those ratings decline, as applicable).
The obligations of the Company and its subsidiaries in respect of the 2015 Senior Credit Facility are unsecured.
The 2015 Senior Credit Facility includes certain affirmative and negative covenants that impose restrictions on the Company's financial and business operations, including limitations on liens, subsidiary indebtedness, fundamental changes, asset dispositions, dividends and other similar restricted payments, transactions with affiliates, future negative pledges, and changes in the nature of the Company's business. The Company is also required to maintain a Consolidated Interest Coverage Ratio of at least 3.0 to 1.0 and a Consolidated Net Leverage Ratio of no more than 3.75 to 1.0, each as of the last day of any fiscal quarter. The limitations contain customary exceptions or, in certain cases, do not apply as long as the Company is in compliance with the financial ratio requirements and is not otherwise in default.
The 2015 Senior Credit Facility also contains customary representations and warranties and events of default, subject to customary grace periods.
The Company paid financing costs of $567 in connection with the extension of its 2015 Senior Credit Facility from March 26, 2021 to March 26, 2022. These costs were deferred and, along with unamortized costs of $6,873 are being amortized over the term of the 2015 Senior Credit Facility.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
As of July 1, 2017, amounts utilized under the 2015 Senior Credit Facility included $48,773 of borrowings and $32,312 of standby letters of credit related to various insurance contracts and foreign vendor commitments. The outstanding borrowings of $1,544,832 under the Company's U.S. and European commercial paper programs as of July 1, 2017 reduce the availability of the 2015 Senior Credit Facility. Including commercial paper borrowings, the Company has utilized $1,625,917 under the 2015 Senior Credit Facility resulting in a total of $174,083 available as of July 1, 2017.
Commercial Paper
On February 28, 2014 and July 31, 2015, the Company established programs for the issuance of unsecured commercial paper in the United States and Eurozone capital markets, respectively. Commercial paper issued under the U.S. and European programs will have maturities ranging up to 397 days and 183 days, respectively. None of the commercial paper notes may be voluntarily prepaid or redeemed by the Company and all rank pari passu with all of the Company's other unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness. To the extent that the Company issues European commercial paper notes through a subsidiary of the Company, the notes will be fully and unconditionally guaranteed by the Company.
The Company uses its 2015 Senior Credit Facility as a liquidity backstop for its commercial paper programs. Accordingly, the total amount outstanding under all of the Company's commercial paper programs may not exceed $1,800,000 (less any amounts drawn on the 2015 Credit Facility) at any time.
The proceeds from the issuance of commercial paper notes will be available for general corporate purposes. As of July 1, 2017, there was $478,790 outstanding under the U.S. program, and the euro equivalent of $1,066,042 was outstanding under the European program. The weighted-average interest rate and maturity period for the U.S. program were 1.36% and 7.56 days, respectively. The weighted average interest rate and maturity period for the European program were (0.18)% and 30.43 days, respectively.
Senior Notes
On June 9, 2015, the Company issued €500,000 aggregate principal amount of 2.00% Senior Notes due January 14, 2022. The 2.00% Senior Notes are senior unsecured obligations of the Company and rank pari passu with all of the Company’s existing and future unsecured indebtedness. Interest on the 2.00% Senior Notes is payable annually in cash on January 14 of each year. The Company paid financing costs of $4,218 in connection with the 2.00% Senior Notes. These costs were deferred and are being amortized over the term of the 2.00% Senior Notes.
On January 31, 2013, the Company issued $600,000 aggregate principal amount of 3.85% Senior Notes due February 1, 2023. The 3.85% Senior Notes are senior unsecured obligations of the Company and rank pari passu with all the Company's existing and future unsecured indebtedness. Interest on the 3.85% Senior Notes is payable semi-annually in cash on February 1 and August 1 of each year. The Company paid financing costs of $6,000 in connection with the 3.85% Senior Notes. These costs were deferred and are being amortized over the term of the 3.85% Senior Notes.
On January 17, 2006, the Company issued $900,000 aggregate principal amount of 6.125% Senior Notes due January 15, 2016. During 2014, the Company purchased for cash $254,445 aggregate principal amount of its outstanding 6.125% Senior Notes due January 15, 2016. On January 15, 2016, the Company paid the remaining $645,555 outstanding principal of its 6.125% Senior Notes (plus accrued but unpaid interest) utilizing cash on hand and borrowings under its U.S. commercial paper program.
Accounts Receivable Securitization
On December 19, 2012, the Company entered into a three-year on-balance sheet trade accounts receivable securitization agreement (the "Securitization Facility"). On September 11, 2014, the Company made certain modifications to its Securitization Facility, which modifications, among other things, increased the aggregate borrowings available under the facility from $300,000 to $500,000 and decreased the interest margins on certain borrowings. On December 10, 2015, the Company amended the terms of the Securitization Facility, reducing the applicable margin and extending the termination date from December 19, 2015 to December 19, 2016. The Company further amended the terms of the Securitization Facility on December 13, 2016, extending the termination date to December 19, 2017. The Company paid financing costs of $250 in connection with this extension. These costs were deferred and are being amortized over the remaining term of the Securitization Facility.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Under the terms of the Securitization Facility, certain subsidiaries of the Company sell at a discount certain of their trade accounts receivable (the “Receivables”) to Mohawk Factoring, LLC (“Factoring”) on a revolving basis. Factoring is a wholly owned, bankruptcy remote subsidiary of the Company, meaning that Factoring is a separate legal entity whose assets are available to satisfy the claims of the creditors of Factoring only, not the creditors of the Company or the Company’s other subsidiaries. To fund such purchases, Factoring may borrow up to $500,000 based on the amount of eligible Receivables owned by Factoring, and Factoring has granted a security interest in all of such Receivables to the third-party lending group as collateral for such borrowings. Amounts loaned to Factoring under the Securitization Facility bear interest at LIBOR plus an applicable margin of 0.70% per annum. Factoring also pays a commitment fee at a per annum rate of 0.30% on the unused amount of each lender’s commitment. As of July 1, 2017, the amount utilized under the Securitization Facility was $150,000.
The fair values and carrying values of our debt instruments are detailed as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| July 1, 2017 | | December 31, 2016 |
| Fair Value | | Carrying Value | | Fair Value | | Carrying Value |
3.85% Senior Notes, payable February 1, 2023; interest payable semiannually | $ | 621,852 |
| | 600,000 |
| | 615,006 |
| | 600,000 |
|
2.00% Senior Notes, payable January 14, 2022; interest payable annually | 598,749 |
| | 571,298 |
| | 556,460 |
| | 525,984 |
|
U.S. commercial paper | 478,790 |
| | 478,790 |
| | 283,800 |
| | 283,800 |
|
European commercial paper | 1,066,042 |
| | 1,066,042 |
| | 536,503 |
| | 536,503 |
|
2015 Senior Credit Facility | 48,773 |
| | 48,773 |
| | 60,672 |
| | 60,672 |
|
Securitization facility, due December 19, 2017 | 150,000 |
| | 150,000 |
| | 500,000 |
| | 500,000 |
|
Capital leases and other | 19,727 |
| | 19,727 |
| | 11,643 |
| | 11,643 |
|
Unamortized debt issuance costs | (6,113 | ) | | (6,113 | ) | | (7,117 | ) | | (7,117 | ) |
Total debt | 2,977,820 |
| | 2,928,517 |
| | 2,556,967 |
| | 2,511,485 |
|
Less current portion of long term debt and commercial paper | 1,754,077 |
| | 1,754,077 |
| | 1,382,738 |
| | 1,382,738 |
|
Long-term debt, less current portion | $ | 1,223,743 |
| | 1,174,440 |
| | 1,174,229 |
| | 1,128,747 |
|
The fair values of the Company’s debt instruments were estimated using market observable inputs, including quoted prices in active markets, market indices and interest rate measurements. Within the hierarchy of fair value measurements, these are Level 2 fair values.
| |
Item 2. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
Overview
Mohawk Industries, Inc. (“Mohawk” or the “Company”) is a leading global flooring manufacturer that creates products to enhance residential and commercial spaces around the world. The Company's vertically integrated manufacturing and distribution processes provide competitive advantages in carpet, rugs, ceramic tile, laminate, wood, stone, luxury vinyl tile ("LVT") and vinyl flooring. The Company's industry-leading innovation develops products and technologies that differentiate its brands in the marketplace and satisfy all flooring related remodeling and new construction requirements. The Company's brands are among the most recognized in the industry and include American Olean®, Daltile®, Durkan®, IVC®, Karastan®, Marazzi®, Mohawk®, Pergo®, Quick-Step® and Unilin®. The Company has transformed its business from an American carpet manufacturer into the world's largest flooring company with operations in Australia, Brazil, Canada, Europe, India, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Russia and the United States. The Company had annual net sales in 2016 of $9.0 billion.
The Company has three reporting segments, Global Ceramic, Flooring North America ("Flooring NA") and Flooring Rest of the World ("Flooring ROW"). The Global Ceramic segment designs, manufactures, sources and markets a broad line of ceramic tile, porcelain tile, natural stone and other products, which it distributes primarily in North America, Europe and Russia through various selling channels, which include company-owned stores, independent distributors and home centers. The segment’s product lines are sold through Company-operated service centers, independent distributors, home center retailers, tile and flooring retailers and contractors. The Flooring NA segment designs, manufactures, sources and markets its floor covering product lines, including carpets, rugs, carpet pad, hardwood, laminate and vinyl products, including LVT, which it distributes through its network of regional distribution centers and satellite warehouses using Company-operated trucks, common carrier or rail transportation. The segment’s product lines are sold through various selling channels, including independent floor covering retailers, distributors, home centers, mass merchandisers, department stores, shop at home, buying groups, commercial contractors and commercial end users. The Flooring ROW segment designs, manufactures, sources, licenses and markets laminate, hardwood flooring, roofing elements, insulation boards, medium-density fiberboard ("MDF"), chipboards, other wood products and vinyl products, including LVT, which it distributes primarily in Europe and Russia through various selling channels, which include retailers, independent distributors and home centers.
The Company is a significant participant in every major product category across the global flooring industry. During 2016 industry sales of tile, LVT, sheet vinyl, laminate and wood grew faster than sales of carpet and rugs. Inside the soft surface category, sales of polyester carpets are increasing, which decreases the average selling price in the soft surface category. The Company believes that it is well positioned in all product types to satisfy these changes in customer trends.
A majority of the Company’s sales and long-lived assets are located in the United States and Europe. The Company expects continued strong performance in the United States market if residential housing starts and remodeling continues to improve. The Company also has operations in Europe, Mexico and Russia where the Company is growing market share, especially in its ceramic tile product lines. The Company expects second quarter sales growth to continue on a local basis, and operating income should improve despite inflation, expiring patents and a weaker British Pound. The Company is also implementing product price increases across the enterprise due to escalating material costs.
For the three months ended July 1, 2017, net earnings attributable to the Company were $260.7 million, or diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) of $3.48, compared to the net earnings attributable to the Company of $255.2 million, or diluted EPS of $3.42, for the three months ended July 2, 2016. For the six months ended July 1, 2017, net earnings attributable to the Company were $461.2 million, or diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) of $6.17, compared to the net earnings attributable to the Company of $426.7 million, or diluted EPS of $5.73, for the six months ended July 2, 2016. The increase in diluted EPS for the three and six months ended July 1, 2017 was primarily attributable to increased sales volumes, savings from capital investments and cost reduction initiatives, the favorable net impact of price and product mix, lower interest rates and the favorable impact of foreign exchange rates on transactions, partially offset by higher input costs, increased employee costs, costs associated with investments in new product development, sales personnel, and marketing, and the unfavorable impact of higher restructuring, acquisition and integration-related, and other costs.
Recent Events
On April 4, 2017, the Company completed the acquisition of Emil for approximately $186.2 million. The Company also acquired three additional businesses during the second quarter of 2017 for approximately $63.4 million.
Results of Operations
Quarter Ended July 1, 2017, as compared with Quarter Ended July 2, 2016
Net sales
Net sales for the three months ended July 1, 2017 were $2,453.0 million, reflecting an increase of $142.7 million, or 6.2%, from the $2,310.3 million reported for the three months ended July 2, 2016. The increase was primarily attributable to higher sales volume of approximately $109 million, or 5%, which includes legacy sales volume of approximately $84 million and sales volume attributable to acquisitions of approximately $48 million, offset by the unfavorable impact of fewer shipping days in the second quarter of 2017 of approximately $23 million. Also contributing to the increase in sales was the favorable net impact of price and product mix of approximately $46 million, or 2%, partially offset by the net impact of unfavorable foreign exchange rates of approximately $12 million.
Global Ceramic segment—Net sales increased $72.9 million, or 8.8%, to $902.7 million for the three months ended July 1, 2017, compared to $829.8 million for the three months ended July 2, 2016. The increase was primarily attributable to higher sales volume of approximately $60 million, or 7%, which includes legacy sales volume of approximately $18 million and sales volume attributable to acquisitions of approximately $48 million, offset by the unfavorable impact of fewer shipping days in the second quarter of 2017 of approximately $6 million. Also contributing to the increase in sales was the favorable net impact of price and product mix of approximately $11 million, or 1%.
Flooring NA segment—Net sales increased $59.6 million, or 6.1%, to $1,040.3 million for the three months ended July 1, 2017, compared to $980.7 million for the three months ended July 2, 2016. The increase was primarily attributable to higher sales volume of approximately $39 million, or 4%, and the favorable net impact of price and product mix of approximately $21 million, or 2%.
Flooring ROW segment—Net sales increased $10.2 million, or 2.0%, to $510.1 million for the three months ended July 1, 2017, compared to $499.8 million for the three months ended July 2, 2016. The increase was primarily attributable to higher sales volume of approximately $11 million, or 2%, despite a decline in patent revenue, and includes the unfavorable impact of fewer shipping days in the second quarter of 2017 of approximately $17 million, and the favorable impact of price and product mix of approximately $15 million, or 3%, partially offset by the net impact of unfavorable foreign exchange rates of approximately $15 million, or 3%.
Gross profit
Gross profit for the three months ended July 1, 2017 was $779.1 million (31.8% of net sales), an increase of $23.5 million or 3.1%, compared to gross profit of $755.6 million (32.7% of net sales) for the three months ended July 2, 2016. As a percentage of net sales, gross profit decreased 90 basis points. The increase in gross profit dollars was primarily attributable to higher sales volume of approximately $31 million, savings from capital investments and cost reduction initiatives of approximately $38 million, and the favorable net impact of price and product mix of approximately $39 million, partially offset by higher input costs of approximately $58 million, including increased material costs of approximately $41 million, the unfavorable impact of higher restructuring, acquisition and integration-related, and other costs of approximately $20 million, the net impact of unfavorable foreign exchange rates of approximately $3 million, and investments in expansion of production capacity of approximately $3 million.
Selling, general and administrative expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses for the three months ended July 1, 2017 were $423.3 million (17.3% of net sales), an increase of $18.4 million compared to $404.9 million (17.5% of net sales) for the three months ended July 2, 2016. As a percentage of net sales, selling, general and administrative expenses decreased 20 basis points. The increase in selling, general and administrative expenses in dollars was primarily attributable to approximately $18 million of costs due to higher sales volume and approximately $7 million of costs associated with investments in new product development, sales personnel, and marketing, partially offset by savings from capital investments and cost reduction initiatives of approximately $7 million.
Operating income
Operating income for the three months ended July 1, 2017 was $355.8 million (14.5% of net sales) reflecting an increase of $5.1 million, or 1.5%, compared to operating income of $350.7 million (15.2% of net sales) for the three months ended July 2, 2016. The increase in operating income was primarily attributable to savings from capital investments and cost reduction initiatives of approximately $44 million, the favorable net impact of price and product mix of approximately $38 million, and increased sales volume of approximately $13 million, partially offset by higher input costs of approximately $58 million, including increased material costs of approximately $41 million, approximately $7 million of costs associated with investments in new product development, sales personnel, and marketing, the unfavorable impact of higher restructuring, acquisition and integration-related, and other costs of approximately $19 million, the net impact of unfavorable foreign exchange rates of approximately $2 million, and investments in expansion of production capacity of approximately $3 million.
Global Ceramic segment—Operating income was $152.6 million (16.9% of segment net sales) for the three months ended July 1, 2017 reflecting an increase of $12.0 million compared to operating income of $140.6 million (16.9% of segment net sales) for the three months ended July 2, 2016. The increase in operating income was primarily attributable to savings from capital investments and cost reduction initiatives of approximately $19 million, increased sales volume of approximately $14 million, the favorable net impact of price and product mix of approximately $5 million, and the net impact of favorable exchange rates of approximately $2 million, partially offset by higher input costs of approximately $11 million, the unfavorable impact of higher restructuring, acquisition and integration-related, and other costs of approximately $10 million, and approximately $3 million of costs associated with investments in new product development, sales personnel, and marketing.
Flooring NA segment—Operating income was $127.5 million (12.3% of segment net sales) for the three months ended July 1, 2017 reflecting an increase of $8.5 million compared to operating income of $118.9 million (12.1% of segment net sales) for the three months ended July 2, 2016. The increase in operating income was primarily attributable to the favorable net impact of price and product mix of approximately $20 million, savings from capital investments and cost reduction initiatives of approximately $12 million, and increased sales volumes of approximately $6 million, partially offset by higher input costs of approximately $22 million, including increased material costs of approximately $17 million, and the unfavorable impact of higher restructuring, acquisition and integration-related, and other costs of approximately $6 million.
Flooring ROW segment—Operating income was $86.1 million (16.9% of segment net sales) for the three months ended July 1, 2017 reflecting a decrease of $15.0 million compared to operating income of $101.1 million (20.2% of segment net sales) for the three months ended July 2, 2016. The decrease in operating income was primarily attributable to higher input costs of approximately $23 million, including increased material costs of approximately $22 million, approximately $7 million in decreased sales volumes, primarily attributable to lower patent revenue, the net impact of unfavorable exchange rates of approximately $5 million, investments in new product development, sales personnel and marketing of approximately $3 million and the unfavorable impact of higher restructuring, acquisition and integration-related, and other costs of approximately $3 million. These decreases in operating income were partially offset by the favorable net impact of price and product mix of approximately $14 million and savings from capital investments and cost reduction initiatives of approximately $13 million.
Interest expense
Interest expense was $8.4 million for the three months ended July 1, 2017, reflecting a decrease of $2.0 million compared to interest expense of $10.4 million for the three months ended July 2, 2016. The decrease was primarily attributable to a shift in the Company's borrowings to lower interest rate instruments.
Other (income) expense, net
Other expense was $3.0 million for the three months ended July 1, 2017, reflecting an unfavorable change of $8.8 million compared to other income of $5.8 million for the three months ended July 2, 2016. The change was primarily attributable to the unfavorable impact of foreign exchange rates on transactions.
Income tax expense
For the three months ended July 1, 2017, the Company recorded income tax expense of $82.7 million on earnings before income taxes of $344.4 million for an effective tax rate of 24.0%, as compared to an income tax expense of $90.0 million on earnings before income taxes of $346.1 million, for an effective tax rate of 26.0% for the three months ended July 2, 2016. The difference in the effective tax rate for the comparative period is due to a discrete benefit related to Italian acquisition planning elections, partially offset by an unrelated change in Italian tax law and the geographic dispersion of earnings and losses for the periods.
Six Months Ended July 1, 2017, as compared with Six Months Ended July 2, 2016
Net sales
Net sales for the six months ended July 1, 2017 were $4,673.7 million, reflecting an increase of $191.3 million, or 4.3%, from the $4,482.4 million reported for the six months ended July 2, 2016. The increase was primarily attributable to higher sales volume of approximately $159 million, or 4%, which includes legacy sales volume of approximately $111 million and sales volume attributable to acquisitions of approximately $48 million, and the favorable net impact of price and product mix of approximately $62 million, or 1%, partially offset by the net impact of unfavorable foreign exchange rates of approximately $31 million, or 1%.
Global Ceramic segment—Net sales increased $84.1 million, or 5.2%, to 1,687.6 million for the six months ended July 1, 2017, compared to $1,603.5 million for the six months ended July 2, 2016. The increase was primarily attributable to higher sales volume of approximately $63 million, or 4%, which includes legacy sales volume of approximately $15 million and sales volume attributable to acquisitions of approximately $48 million, and the favorable net impact of price and product mix of approximately $18 million, or 1%.
Flooring NA segment—Net sales increased $92.7 million, or 4.9%, to $1,979.8 million for the six months ended July 1, 2017, compared to $1,887.1 million for the six months ended July 2, 2016. The increase was primarily attributable to higher sales volumes of approximately $67 million, or 4%, and the favorable net impact of price and product mix of $26 million, or 1%.
Flooring ROW segment—Net sales increased $14.4 million, or 1.5%, to $1,006.2 million for the six months ended July 1, 2017, compared to $991.8 million for the six months ended July 2, 2016. The increase was primarily attributable to higher sales volume of approximately $31 million, or 3%, despite a decline in patent revenue, and the favorable net impact of price and product mix of approximately $18 million, or 2%, partially offset by the net impact of unfavorable foreign exchange rates of approximately $34 million, or 3%.
Gross profit
Gross profit for the six months ended July 1, 2017 was $1,459.5 million (31.2% of net sales), an increase of $64.2 million or 4.6%, compared to gross profit of $1,395.3 million (31.1% of net sales) for the six months ended July 2, 2016. As a percentage of net sales, gross profit increased 10 basis points. The increase in gross profit dollars was primarily attributable to higher sales volume of approximately $46 million, savings from capital investments and cost reduction initiatives of approximately $74 million, and the favorable net impact of price and product mix of approximately $49 million, partially offset by higher input costs of approximately $81 million, including increased material costs of approximately $51 million, the unfavorable impact of higher restructuring, acquisition and integration-related, and other costs of approximately $17 million and the net impact of unfavorable foreign exchange rates of approximately $7 million.
Selling, general and administrative expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses for the six months ended July 1, 2017 were $828.9 million (17.7% of net sales), an increase of $30.0 million compared to $798.9 million (17.8% of net sales) for the six months ended July 2, 2016. As a percentage of net sales, selling, general and administrative expenses decreased 10 basis points. The increase in selling, general and administrative expenses in dollars was primarily attributable to approximately $24 million of costs due to higher sales volume and approximately $14 million of costs associated with investments in new product development, sales personnel, and marketing, partially offset by savings from capital investments and cost reduction initiatives of approximately $11 million.
Operating income
Operating income for the six months ended July 1, 2017 was $630.6 million (13.5% of net sales) reflecting an increase of $34.2 million, or 5.7%, compared to operating income of $596.4 million (13.3% of net sales) for the six months ended July 2, 2016. The increase in operating income was primarily attributable to savings from capital investments and cost reduction initiatives of approximately $85 million, the favorable net impact of price and product mix of approximately $48 million, and increased sales volume of approximately $22 million, partially offset by higher input costs of approximately $81 million, including increased material costs of approximately $51 million, approximately $14 million of costs associated with investments in new product development, sales personnel, and marketing, and the unfavorable impact of higher restructuring, acquisition and integration-related, and other costs of approximately $17 million.
Global Ceramic segment—Operating income was $268.6 million (15.9% of segment net sales) for the six months ended July 1, 2017 reflecting an increase of $28.2 million compared to operating income of $240.4 million (15.0% of segment net sales) for the six months ended July 2, 2016. The increase in operating income was primarily attributable to savings from capital investments and cost reduction initiatives of approximately $38 million, and increased sales volumes of approximately $14 million, partially offset by higher input costs of approximately $20 million, and the unfavorable impact of higher restructuring, acquisition and integration-related, and other costs of approximately $10 million.
Flooring NA segment—Operating income was $219.6 million (11.1% of segment net sales) for the six months ended July 1, 2017 reflecting an increase of $25.3 million compared to operating income of $194.3 million (10.3% of segment net sales) for the six months ended July 2, 2016. The increase in operating income was primarily attributable to savings from capital investments and cost reduction initiatives of approximately $25 million, the favorable net impact of price and product mix of approximately $21 million and increased sales volumes of approximately $12 million, partially offset by higher input costs of approximately $23 million, including increased material costs of approximately $15 million, and the unfavorable impact of higher restructuring, acquisition and integration-related, and other costs of approximately $5 million.
Flooring ROW segment—Operating income was $162.1 million (16.1% of segment net sales) for the six months ended July 1, 2017 reflecting a decrease of $18.5 million compared to operating income of $180.6 million (18.2% of segment net sales) for the six months ended July 2, 2016. The decrease in operating income was primarily attributable to higher input costs of approximately $35 million, including increased material costs of approximately $33 million, the net impact of unfavorable exchange rates of approximately $10 million, approximately $6 million of costs associated with investments in new product development, sales personnel, and marketing,and approximately $4 million in decreased sales volumes, primarily attributable to lower patent revenue. These decreases in operating income were partially offset by savings from capital investments and cost reduction initiatives of approximately $22 million, and the favorable net impact of price and product mix of approximately $17 million.
Interest expense
Interest expense was $16.6 million for the six months ended July 1, 2017, reflecting a decrease of $6.1 million compared to interest expense of $22.7 million for the six months ended July 2, 2016. The decrease was primarily attributable to a shift in the Company's borrowings to lower interest rate instruments.
Other expense, net
Other expense was $0.2 million for the six months ended July 1, 2017, reflecting an unfavorable change of $2.5 million compared to other income of $2.4 million for the six months ended July 2, 2016. The change was primarily due to other miscellaneous settlements.
Income tax expense
For the six months ended July 1, 2017, the Company recorded income tax expense of $151.0 million on earnings before income taxes of $613.8 million for an effective tax rate of 24.6%, as compared to an income tax expense of $147.9 million on earnings before income taxes of $576.1 million, for an effective tax rate of 25.7% for the six months ended July 2, 2016. The difference in the effective tax rate for the comparative period is due to a discrete benefit related to Italian acquisition planning elections, partially offset by an unrelated change in Italian tax law and the geographic dispersion of earnings and losses for the periods.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Company’s primary capital requirements are for working capital, capital expenditures and acquisitions. The Company’s capital needs are met primarily through a combination of internally generated funds, commercial paper, bank credit lines, term and senior notes and credit terms from suppliers. As of July 1, 2017, the Company had a total of $174.1 million available under its 2015 Senior Credit Facility and $350.0 million under its Securitization Facility.
Net cash provided by operating activities in the first six months of 2017 was $413.9 million, compared to net cash provided by operating activities of $564.7 million in the first six months of 2016. The decrease of $150.9 million in 2017 was primarily attributable to changes in working capital. These changes in working capital reflect normal fluctuations relative to the timing and nature of these transactions.
Net cash used in investing activities in the first six months of 2017 was $675.9 million compared to net cash used in investing activities of $276.9 million in the first six months of 2016. The increase was primarily due to acquisitions in the current
year of $250.5 million. Also, capital expenditures increased by $148.5 million to $425.4 million in the current year. The Company continues to invest to optimize sales and profit growth this year and beyond with product expansion and cost reduction projects in the business. Capital spending during the remainder of 2017 is expected to exceed $450 million, resulting in the full year spending being in excess of $850 million.
Net cash provided by financing activities in the first six months of 2017 was $257.3 million compared to net cash used in financing activities of $264.7 million in the six months of 2016. The change in cash provided by financing is primarily attributable to the repayment of senior notes of $646 million in the prior year, partially offset by decreased borrowings in the current year.
Senior Credit Facility
On March 26, 2015, the Company amended and restated its 2013 Senior Credit Facility increasing its size from $1,000.0 million to $1,800.0 million and extending the maturity from September 25, 2018 to March 26, 2020 (as amended and restated, the "2015 Senior Credit Facility"). The 2015 Senior Credit Facility eliminated certain provisions in the 2013 Senior Credit Facility, including those that: (a) accelerated the maturity date to 90 days prior to the maturity of senior notes due in January 2016 if certain specified liquidity levels were not met; and (b) required that certain subsidiaries guarantee the Company's obligations if the Company’s credit ratings fell below investment grade. The 2015 Senior Credit Facility also modified certain negative covenants to provide the Company with additional flexibility, including flexibility to make acquisitions and incur additional indebtedness. On March 1, 2016, the Company amended the 2015 Senior Credit Facility to, among other things, carve out from the general limitation on subsidiary indebtedness with respect to the issuance of Euro-denominated commercial paper notes by subsidiaries. Additionally, at several points in 2016, the Company extended the maturity date of the 2015 Senior Credit Facility from March 26, 2020 to March 26, 2021. In March 2017, the Company amended the 2015 Senior Credit Facility to extend the maturity date from March 26, 2021 to March 26, 2022 with respect to all but $75.0 million of the total amount committed under the 2015 Senior Credit Facility. In April 2017 and June 2017, the Company extended the maturity for the remaining $75.0 million to March 26, 2022.
At the Company's election, revolving loans under the 2015 Senior Credit Facility bear interest at annual rates equal to either (a) LIBOR for 1, 2, 3 or 6 month periods, as selected by the Company, plus an applicable margin ranging between 1.00% and 1.75% (1.125% as of July 1, 2017), or (b) the higher of the Wells Fargo Bank, National Association prime rate, the Federal Funds rate plus 0.5%, or a monthly LIBOR rate plus 1.0%, plus an applicable margin ranging between 0.00% and 0.75% (0.125% as of July 1, 2017). The Company also pays a commitment fee to the lenders under the 2015 Senior Credit Facility on the average amount by which the aggregate commitments of the lenders' exceed utilization of the 2015 Senior Credit Facility ranging from 0.10% to 0.225% per annum (0.125% as of July 1, 2017). The applicable margins and the commitment fee are determined based on whichever of the Company's Consolidated Net Leverage Ratio or its senior unsecured debt rating (or if not available, corporate family rating) results in the lower applicable margins and commitment fee (with applicable margins and the commitment fee increasing as that ratio increases or those ratings decline, as applicable).
The obligations of the Company and its subsidiaries in respect of the 2015 Senior Credit Facility are unsecured.
The 2015 Senior Credit Facility includes certain affirmative and negative covenants that impose restrictions on the Company's financial and business operations, including limitations on liens, subsidiary indebtedness, fundamental changes, asset dispositions, dividends and other similar restricted payments, transactions with affiliates, future negative pledges, and changes in the nature of the Company's business. The Company is also required to maintain a Consolidated Interest Coverage Ratio of at least 3.0 to 1.0 and a Consolidated Net Leverage Ratio of no more than 3.75 to 1.0, each as of the last day of any fiscal quarter. The limitations contain customary exceptions or, in certain cases, do not apply as long as the Company is in compliance with the financial ratio requirements and is not otherwise in default.
The 2015 Senior Credit Facility also contains customary representations and warranties and events of default, subject to customary grace periods.
The Company paid financing costs of $0.6 million in connection with the extension of its 2015 Senior Credit Facility from March 26, 2021 to March 26, 2022. These costs were deferred and, along with unamortized costs of $6.9 million are being amortized over the term of the 2015 Senior Credit Facility.
As of July 1, 2017, amounts utilized under the 2015 Senior Credit Facility included $48.8 million of borrowings and $32.3 million of standby letters of credit related to various insurance contracts and foreign vendor commitments. The outstanding borrowings of $1,544.8 million under the Company's U.S. and European commercial paper programs as of July 1, 2017 reduce the availability of the 2015 Senior Credit Facility. Including commercial paper borrowings, the Company has utilized $1,625.9 million under the 2015 Senior Credit Facility resulting in a total of $174.1 million available as of July 1, 2017.
Commercial Paper
On February 28, 2014 and July 31, 2015, the Company established programs for the issuance of unsecured commercial paper in the United States and Eurozone capital markets, respectively. Commercial paper issued under the U.S. and European programs will have maturities ranging up to 397 days and 183 days, respectively. None of the commercial paper notes may be voluntarily prepaid or redeemed by the Company and all rank pari passu with all of the Company's other unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness. To the extent that the Company issues European commercial paper notes through a subsidiary of the Company, the notes will be fully and unconditionally guaranteed by the Company.
The Company uses its 2015 Senior Credit Facility as a liquidity backstop for its commercial paper programs. Accordingly, the total amount outstanding under all of the Company's commercial paper programs may not exceed $1,800.0 million (less any amounts drawn on the 2015 Credit Facility) at any time.
The proceeds from the issuance of commercial paper notes will be available for general corporate purposes. As of July 1, 2017, there was $478.8 million outstanding under the U.S. program, and the euro equivalent of $1,066.0 million was outstanding under the European program. The weighted-average interest rate and maturity period for the U.S. program were 1.36% and 7.56 days, respectively. The weighted average interest rate and maturity period for the European program were (0.18)% and 30.43 days, respectively.
Senior Notes
On June 9, 2015, the Company issued €500.0 million aggregate principal amount of 2.00% Senior Notes due January 14, 2022. The 2.00% Senior Notes are senior unsecured obligations of the Company and rank pari passu with all of the Company’s existing and future unsecured indebtedness. Interest on the 2.00% Senior Notes is payable annually in cash on January 14 of each year. The Company paid financing costs of $4.2 million in connection with the 2.00% Senior Notes. These costs were deferred and are being amortized over the term of the 2.00% Senior Notes.
On January 31, 2013, the Company issued $600.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.85% Senior Notes due February 1, 2023. The 3.85% Senior Notes are senior unsecured obligations of the Company and rank pari passu with all the Company's existing and future unsecured indebtedness. Interest on the 3.85% Senior Notes is payable semi-annually in cash on February 1 and August 1 of each year. The Company paid financing costs of $6.0 million in connection with the 3.85% Senior Notes. These costs were deferred and are being amortized over the term of the 3.85% Senior Notes.
On January 17, 2006, the Company issued $900.0 million aggregate principal amount of 6.125% Senior Notes due January 15, 2016. During 2014, the Company purchased for cash $254.4 million aggregate principal amount of its outstanding 6.125% Senior Notes due January 15, 2016. On January 15, 2016, the Company paid the remaining $645.6 million outstanding principal of its 6.125% Senior Notes (plus accrued but unpaid interest) utilizing cash on hand and borrowings under its U.S. commercial paper program.
Accounts Receivable Securitization
On December 19, 2012, the Company entered into a three-year on-balance sheet trade accounts receivable securitization agreement (the "Securitization Facility"). On September 11, 2014, the Company made certain modifications to its Securitization Facility, which modifications, among other things, increased the aggregate borrowings available under the facility from $300.0 million to $500.0 million and decreased the interest margins on certain borrowings. On December 10, 2015, the Company amended the terms of the Securitization Facility, reducing the applicable margin and extending the termination date from December 19, 2015 to December 19, 2016. The Company further amended the terms of the Securitization Facility on December 13, 2016, extending the termination date to December 19, 2017. The Company paid financing costs of $0.3 million in connection with this extension. These costs were deferred and are being amortized over the remaining term of the Securitization Facility.
Under the terms of the Securitization Facility, certain subsidiaries of the Company sell at a discount certain of their trade accounts receivable (the “Receivables”) to Mohawk Factoring, LLC (“Factoring”) on a revolving basis. Factoring is a wholly owned, bankruptcy remote subsidiary of the Company, meaning that Factoring is a separate legal entity whose assets are available to satisfy the claims of the creditors of Factoring only, not the creditors of the Company or the Company’s other subsidiaries. To fund such purchases, Factoring may borrow up to $500.0 million based on the amount of eligible Receivables owned by Factoring, and Factoring has granted a security interest in all of such Receivables to the third-party lending group as collateral for such borrowings. Amounts loaned to Factoring under the Securitization Facility bear interest at LIBOR plus an applicable margin of 0.70% per annum. Factoring also pays a commitment fee at a per annum rate of 0.30% on the unused amount of each lender’s commitment. As of July 1, 2017, the amount utilized under the Securitization Facility was $150.0 million.
The Company may continue, from time to time, to retire its outstanding debt through cash purchases in the open market, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise. Such repurchases, if any, will depend on prevailing market conditions, the Company’s liquidity requirements, contractual restrictions and other factors. The amount involved may be material.
As of July 1, 2017, the Company had cash of $130.2 million, of which $106.9 million was held outside the United States. While the Company’s plans are to permanently reinvest the cash held outside the United States, the estimated cost of repatriation for the cash as of July 1, 2017 was approximately $37.4 million. The Company believes that its cash and cash equivalents on hand, cash generated from operations and availability under its existing credit facilities will be sufficient to meet its capital expenditure, working capital and debt servicing requirements over the next twelve months.
Contractual Obligations
There have been no significant changes to the Company’s contractual obligations as disclosed in the Company’s 2016 Annual Report filed on Form 10-K.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
There have been no significant changes to the Company’s critical accounting policies and estimates during the period. The Company’s critical accounting policies and estimates are described in its 2016 Annual Report filed on Form 10-K.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 1 in the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of this Form 10-Q under the heading "Recent Accounting Pronouncements" for a discussion of new accounting pronouncements which is incorporated herein by reference.
Impact of Inflation
Inflation affects the Company’s manufacturing costs, distribution costs and operating expenses. The Company expects raw material prices to fluctuate based upon worldwide supply and demand of commodities utilized in the Company’s production processes. Although the Company attempts to pass on increases in raw material, energy and fuel-related costs to its customers, the Company’s ability to do so is dependent upon the rate and magnitude of any increase, competitive pressures and market conditions for the Company’s products. There have been in the past, and may be in the future, periods of time during which increases in these costs cannot be fully recovered. In the past, the Company has often been able to enhance productivity and develop new product innovations to help offset increases in costs resulting from inflation in its operations.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
The Company did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements as of July 1, 2017.
Seasonality
The Company is a calendar year-end company. With respect to its Flooring NA and Global Ceramic segments, its results of operations for the first quarter tend to be the weakest followed by the fourth quarter. The second and third quarters typically produce higher net sales and operating income in these segments. These results are primarily due to consumer residential spending patterns which have historically decreased during the holiday season and the first two months following. The Flooring ROW segment’s second quarter typically produces the highest net sales and earnings followed by a moderate first and fourth quarter and a weaker third quarter.
Forward-Looking Information
Certain of the statements in this Form 10-Q, particularly those anticipating future performance, business prospects, growth and operating strategies, and similar matters, and those that include the words “could,” “should,” “believes,” “anticipates,” “expects” and “estimates” or similar expressions constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. For those statements, Mohawk claims the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. There can be no assurance that the forward-looking statements will be accurate because they are based on many assumptions, which involve risks and uncertainties. The following important factors could cause future results to differ: changes in economic or industry conditions; competition; inflation and deflation in raw material prices and other input costs; inflation and deflation in consumer markets; energy costs and supply; timing and level of capital expenditures; timing and implementation of price increases for the Company’s products; impairment charges; ability to identify attractive acquisition targets; ability to successfully complete and integrate acquisitions; international operations; changes in foreign exchange rates; introduction of new products; rationalization of operations; tax, product and other claims; litigation; and other risks identified in Mohawk’s SEC reports and public announcements.
| |
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
As of July 1, 2017, approximately 40% of the Company's debt portfolio was comprised of fixed-rate debt and 60% was floating-rate debt. A 1.0 percentage point increase in the interest rate of the floating-rate debt would have resulted in an increase in interest expense of $4.4 million and $8.7 million for the three and six months ended July 1, 2017, respectively. There have been no other significant changes to the Company’s exposure to market risk as disclosed in the Company’s 2016 Annual Report filed on Form 10-K.
| |
Item 4. | Controls and Procedures |
Based on an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended), which have been designed to provide reasonable assurance that such controls and procedures will meet their objectives, as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that such controls and procedures were effective at a reasonable assurance level for the period covered by this report.
There were no changes in the Company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this report that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting other than the integration of the acquisitions referenced in Note 2 in the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of this Form 10-Q. As a result of these transactions, the Company's internal control over financial reporting now includes controls, procedures and supporting systems with respect to transactions and account balances of these acquisitions, which are reflected in the Company's consolidated financial statements.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
The Company is involved in litigation from time to time in the regular course of its business. Except as noted below, there are no material legal proceedings pending or known by the Company to be contemplated to which the Company is a party or to which any of its property is subject.
Alabama Municipal Litigation
In September 2016, the Water Works and Sewer Board of the City of Gadsden, Alabama (the “Gadsden Water Board”) filed an individual complaint in the Circuit Court of Etowah County, Alabama against certain manufacturers, suppliers and users of chemicals containing perfluorinated compounds, including the Company. On October 26, 2016, the defendants removed the case to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama, Middle Division, alleging diversity of citizenship and fraudulent joinder. The Gadsden Water Board filed a motion to remand the case back to the state court and the defendants have opposed the Gadsden Water Board’s motion. The parties await a ruling from the federal court on the motion to remand.
In May, 2017, the Water Works and Sewer Board of the Town of Centre, Alabama (the “Centre Water Board”) filed a very similar complaint to the Gadsden Water Board complaint in the Circuit Court of Cherokee County. On June 19, 2017, the defendants removed this case to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama, Middle Division, again alleging diversity of citizenship and fraudulent joinder. The Centre Water Board filed a motion to remand the case back to state court. The defendants will oppose the Centre Water Board’s motion.
The Company has never manufactured perfluorinated compounds, but purchased them for use in the manufacture of its carpets prior to 2007. The Gadsden and Centre Water Boards are not alleging that chemical levels in the Company’s wastewater discharge exceeded legal limits. Instead, the Gadsden and Centre Water Boards are seeking lost profits based on allegations that their customers decreased water purchases, as well as reimbursement for the cost of a filter and punitive damages.
The Company intends to pursue all available defenses related to these matters. The Company does not believe that the ultimate outcome of this case will have a material adverse effect on its financial condition, but there can be no assurances at this stage that the outcome will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations, liquidity or cash flows in a given period. Furthermore, the Company cannot predict whether any additional civil or regulatory actions against it may arise from the allegations in this matter.
Belgian Tax Matter
In January 2012, the Company received a €23.8 million assessment from the Belgian tax authority related to its year ended December 31, 2008, asserting that the Company had understated its Belgian taxable income for that year. The Company filed a formal protest in the first quarter of 2012 refuting the Belgian tax authority's position. The Belgian tax authority set aside the assessment in the third quarter of 2012 and refunded all related deposits, including interest income of €1.6 million earned on such deposits. However, on October 23, 2012, the Belgian tax authority notified the Company of its intent to increase the Company's taxable income for the year ended December 31, 2008 under a revised theory. On December 28, 2012, the Belgian tax authority issued assessments for the years ended December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2009, in the amounts of €46.1 million and €35.6 million, respectively, including penalties, but excluding interest. The Company filed a formal protest during the first quarter of 2013 relating to the new assessments. In September 2013, the Belgian tax authority denied the Company's protests, and the Company has brought these two years before the Court of First Appeal in Bruges. In December 2013, the Belgian tax authority issued additional assessments related to the years ended December 31, 2006, 2007, and 2010, in the amounts of €38.8 million, €39.6 million, and €43.1 million, respectively, including penalties, but excluding interest. The Company filed formal protests during the first quarter of 2014, refuting the Belgian tax authority's position for each of the years assessed. In the quarter ended June 28, 2014, the Company received a formal assessment for the year ended December 31, 2008, totaling €30.1 million, against which the Company also submitted its formal protest. All 4 additional years were brought before the Court of First Appeal in November 2014. In January of 2015, the Company met with the Court of First Appeal in Bruges and agreed with the Belgian tax authorities to consolidate and argue the issues regarding the years 2005 and 2009, and apply the ruling to all of the open years (to the extent there are no additional facts/procedural arguments in the other years). In May 2017, the statute of limitation was extended to include the calendar year 2011.
On January 27, 2016, the Court of First Appeal in Bruges, Belgium ruled in favor of the Company with respect to the calendar years ending December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2009. On March 9, 2016, the Belgian tax authority lodged its Notification of Appeal with the Ghent Court of Appeal.
The Company disagrees with the views of the Belgian tax authority on this matter and will persist in its vigorous defense. Nevertheless, on May 24, 2016, the tax collector representing the Belgian tax authorities imposed a lien on the Company's properties in Wielsbeke (Ooigemstraat and Breestraat), Oostrozebeke (Ingelmunstersteenweg) and Desselgem (Waregemstraat) included in the Flooring ROW segment. The purpose of the lien is to provide security for payment should the Belgian tax authority prevail on its appeal. The lien does not interfere with the Company's operations at these properties.
The Company believes that adequate provisions for resolution of all contingencies, claims and pending litigation have been made for probable losses that are reasonably estimable. These contingencies are subject to significant uncertainties and we are unable to estimate the amount or range of loss, if any, in excess of amounts accrued. Although there can be no assurances, the Company does not believe that the ultimate outcome of these actions will have a material adverse effect on its financial condition but could have a material adverse effect on its results of operations, cash flows or liquidity in a given quarter or year.
There have been no material changes in the Company's risk factors from those disclosed in Part I, Item 1A to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016. The risk factors disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, in addition to the other information set forth in this report, could materially affect our business, financial condition or results.
| |
Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
None.
| |
Item 3. | Defaults Upon Senior Securities |
None.
| |
Item 4. | Mine Safety Disclosures |
The information concerning mine safety violations or other regulatory matters required by Section 1503(a) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and Item 104 of Regulation S-K is included in Exhibit 95.1 to this quarterly report on Form 10-Q.
None.
|
| | |
No. | | Description |
| | |
31.1 | | Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a). |
31.2 | | Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a). |
32.1 | | Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
32.2 | | Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
95.1 | | Mine Safety Disclosure pursuant to Section 1503(a) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act |
101.INS | | XBRL Instance Document. |
101.SCH | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document. |
101.CAL | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document. |
101.DEF | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document. |
101.LAB | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document. |
101.PRE | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document. |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
| | | | |
| | | | MOHAWK INDUSTRIES, INC. |
| | | | (Registrant) |
| | | | |
Dated: | August 4, 2017 | By: | | /s/ Jeffrey S. Lorberbaum |
| | | | JEFFREY S. LORBERBAUM |
| | | | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
| | | | (principal executive officer) |
| | | | |
Dated: | August 4, 2017 | By: | | /s/ Frank H. Boykin |
| | | | FRANK H. BOYKIN |
| | | | Chief Financial Officer |
| | | | (principal financial officer) |
Exhibit
EXHIBIT 31.1
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Jeffrey S. Lorberbaum, certify that:
|
| | |
1. | | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Mohawk Industries, Inc.; |
2. | | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
3. | | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
4. | | The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
| (a) | Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
| (b) | Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
| (c) | Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and |
| (d) | Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and |
5. | | The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
| (a) | All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
| (b) | Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. |
Date: August 4, 2017
|
|
/s/ Jeffrey S. Lorberbaum |
Jeffrey S. Lorberbaum |
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
Exhibit
EXHIBIT 31.2
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Frank H. Boykin, certify that:
|
| | |
1. | | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Mohawk Industries, Inc.; |
2. | | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
3. | | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
4. | | The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
| (a) | Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
| (b) | Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
| (c) | Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and |
| (d) | Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and |
5. | | The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
| (a) | All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
| (b) | Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. |
Date: August 4, 2017
|
|
/s/ Frank H. Boykin |
Frank H. Boykin |
Chief Financial Officer |
Exhibit
EXHIBIT 32.1
Statement of Chief Executive Officer of
MOHAWK INDUSTRIES, INC.
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
In connection with the quarterly report of Mohawk Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 1, 2017 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jeffrey S. Lorberbaum, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:
|
| |
1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|
|
/s/ Jeffrey S. Lorberbaum |
Jeffrey S. Lorberbaum |
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
August 4, 2017
Exhibit
EXHIBIT 32.2
Statement of Chief Financial Officer of
MOHAWK INDUSTRIES, INC.
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
In connection with the quarterly report of Mohawk Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 1, 2017 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Frank H. Boykin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:
|
| |
1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|
|
/s/ Frank H. Boykin |
Frank H. Boykin |
Chief Financial Officer |
August 4, 2017
Exhibit
Mine Safety Disclosure
The following disclosures are provided pursuant to Section 1503(a) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Act”) and Item 104 of Regulation S-K, which requires certain disclosures by companies required to file periodic reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, that operate mines regulated under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (the “Mine Act”).
Mine Safety Information
Whenever the Federal Mine Safety and Health Administration (“MSHA”) believes a violation of the Mine Act, any health or safety standard or any regulation has occurred, it may issue a citation which describes the alleged violation and fixes a time within which the U.S. mining operator must abate the alleged violation. In some situations, such as when MSHA believes that conditions pose a hazard to miners, MSHA may issue an order removing miners from the area of the mine affected by the condition until the alleged hazards are corrected. When MSHA issues a citation or order, it generally proposes a civil penalty, or fine, as a result of the alleged violation, that the operator is ordered to pay. Citations and orders can be contested and appealed, and as part of that process, may be reduced in severity and amount, and are sometimes dismissed. The number of citations, orders and proposed assessments vary depending on the size and type (underground or surface) of the mine as well as by the MSHA inspector(s) assigned.
The following table includes information required by the Act for the three months ended July 1, 2017.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Mine (Federal Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) ID) | Total # of Significant & Substantial violations under §104(a) | Total # of orders under §104(b) | Total # of unwarrantable failure citations and orders under §104(d) | Total # of violations under §110(b)(2) | Total # of orders under §107(a) | Total dollar value of proposed assessments from MSHA ($ in thousands) | Total # of mining related fatalities | Received Notice of Pattern of Violations under §104(e) (yes/no)? | Received Notice of Potential to have Pattern under §104(e) (yes/no)? | Total # of Legal Actions Pending with the Mine Safety and Health Review Commission as of the Last Day of Period | Legal Actions Initiated or Resolved During Period |
TP Claims 1&2/Rosa Blanca (4100867) | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | No | No | — | — |
Allamore Mill (4100869) | — | — | — | — | — | $1.2 | — | No | No | — | — |
Wild Horse Plant (4101527) | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | No | No | — | — |